Only one step has a time that depends on what you are developing. The development step is specific to the film, the developer, the dilution and the temperature. Everything after it is broadly the same whatever is on the reel.
| Step | Roughly | What it is for |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-wash | 1 min | Optional. Brings tank and film to temperature. Some developers advise against it |
| Develop | Per recipe | The image is formed. The only step timed to your specific combination |
| Stop | 30 sec | Halts development at a defined point |
| Fix | Several min | Removes undeveloped silver halide, making the image stable in light |
| Wash | Several min | Removes the fixer. Residual fixer is why negatives deteriorate in storage |
| Wetting agent | 30 sec | Water runs off evenly so the film dries without marks |
Exact times come from the developer's own instructions and from the recipe you are following. The figures above are the shape of the process, not a recipe.
It is not the development step. That one has your full attention: it is the long one, it is the one with a number attached to it, and getting it wrong is the thing everyone worries about.
It is the thirty second stop bath. It runs immediately after a step you were concentrating on, it is short enough that resetting a timer for it feels like more work than counting, and skipping it produces a negative that is not obviously wrong, just slightly further developed than intended, in a way you will attribute to something else.
This is a sequencing problem rather than a knowledge problem. The times are not hard to find. Running four of them back to back, in order, with wet hands and a tank in them, is where it breaks down.
How you agitate is part of the recipe, not a separate preference: a time published for inversions every minute does not hold if you invert continuously. Agitation moves fresh developer across the emulsion, so more of it develops faster. If a recipe specifies a scheme, it is describing the conditions its time was measured under.